Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:55
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Orioles Place Ryan Mountcastle On 10-Day IL, Recall Coby Mayo - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ea autem sint vel distinctio id iste ut.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Report: Steelers, Dolphins renew talks about a trade for Jonnu Smith - NBC Sports
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Can you explain the difference between a shower cap and a hair bonnet?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Et maxime modi eaque sint iure.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US - AP News
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
If you are doing these 6 things, then you’re accidentally making your vegan meals unhealthy - VegOut
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.